K Seles
Jul 1, 2022

--

NO, NO, NO, NO, NO!

Hutchinson's testimony was two-fold.

a) Her direct testimony was first-hand knowledge, and she comported and explained herself with perfect and corroborated credibility.

b) Her second-hand knowledge was accepted as hearsay. She literally heard what other people said they saw. Hearsay is generally not admissible in a court room but welcomed in an investigation where it can or cannot be corroborated by direct witnesses.

As to Trump, we all know he's a deranged socio/psychopath so predicting his behavior is a fools errand.

Proof of Hutchinson's credibility is the 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' of the Trump sycophants who are hysterically - and failingly - trying to discredit her.

--

--

K Seles
K Seles

Written by K Seles

Architect by vocation. Individualist by inclination. Political sociologist, anthropologist, rationalist, philosophist, and cosmologist by avocation.

Responses (1)