The constitutional standard for presidential impeachment is treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. None of which apply to a sloppy consensual private blowjob. The 'lie' was labeled perjury under oath, regardless of the circumstances, Republicans cast it as equivalent to perjury in a murder case. Clinton was technically correct when he stated he did not lie when he said he 'did not have sex with that woman,' sex as defined in discovery did not include felatio. Regardless, pretty thin gruel to overturn the will of the electorate for a damn blowjob.

Ironically, that same electorate overwhelmingly supported President Clinton, and Democrats swept the next election in rejection of Republican overreach.

Ironic, too, that the impeachment was cheered on by the likes of Newt Gingrich and Denny Hastert.

So, tell me again, who had the moral high ground?

And tell me now, which party proves to put party over country, time after time after time?