K Seles
1 min readJan 24, 2021

--

The problem I have with all of these Big Bang related theories is that they are all based upon a beginning of time and space as opposed to an eternity and/or infinity.

As we look out into the sphere of our observable universe, we see ourselves at its center, yet we know this cannot be possible outside of a Biblical explanation of creation. The “horizon” is our horizon. To an observer on that horizon, they are at their own center and we are on their horizon. It’s relative. As we leapfrog that point of observation across the universe, the universe becomes infinite. Then, the Big Bang could not have had a center from which to inflate outward in space as any center would have been everywhere. “Outward in space,” in that reality, has no meaning.

Furthermore, that the beginning of time was 13.77 billion years ago seems equally undefinable. If there were a beginning of time, then “time” before that likewise has no meaning. An eternity of time may encompass the nothingness of 13.78 billion years ago and beyond, which may have occurred in an instant or an eternity. Both, it could be argued, are one in the same thing as neither is measurable. “Beginning of time,” in that reality, also has no meaning.

--

--

K Seles
K Seles

Written by K Seles

Architect by vocation. Individualist by inclination. Political sociologist, anthropologist, rationalist, philosophist, and cosmologist by avocation.

No responses yet